
By 1522 Lutheran ideas were making inroads into southern
When no one stepped forward to defend Seehofer, Argula stepped into the gap herself. On September 20, 1523 issued a letter, that was turned into a booklet, the first ever written by a Protestant woman, addressed to the city council and leading theologians of the university. Here is an abbreviated title for her booklet, The Account of Christian Woman of the Bavarian Nobility Whose Open Letter …” Here are some selections of that booklet a selection from the Preface which most scholars have attributed to Andreas Osiander:
“Brothers: it is time to rouse ourselves from sleep. For our salvation is closer than we think. Therefore, my Christian reader, and you, to, you blind, raging, deluded Pharisees – you have always resisted the Holy Spirit … Many are now quite aware of this saying {i.e. Joel 2} and now it is quite evident in the person of the woman mentioned above {Argula}, that she criticises the biblical scholars at the University of Ingolstadt for their persecution of the holy Gospel (as Judith, chapter eight, the false priests), and exhorts and instructs them, citing a host of ‘insuperable’ divine writings.”
Argula realizes she has “crossed the line” so to speak. The world may have been undergoing radical change as we have seen but it was not prepared for a woman who thought for herself. She explains her actions,
“I suppressed my inclinations, heavy of heart, I did nothing {about the persecution}. Because Paul says in 1 Timothy 2 {v.12f} But now that I cannot see any man who is up to it, who is either willing or able to speak, I am constrained by the saying, ‘Whoever confesses me” …”
Matthew 10 and many female examples in Scripture, Argula believed, charged her as a disciple to stand up and speak out. Argula demands that the theologians prove from Scripture that what Seehofer affirmed was heresy. She even challenged them to a debate. Argula had a formidable knowledge of the Bible, so much so that Balthasar Hubmaier declared that she, a woman, “knows more of the divine word than all these red hats {the theologians} ever saw or could conceive of.” Needless to say the theologians did not accept her challenge.
The wrath of the theologians knew no bounds. Rather than debate her, the powers that be fired her husband and ordered him to bring her in line, using violence if necessary. She needed to remember her “place.” She became the target of Professor Hauer’s sermons. In one sermon on December 8, he used the following epitaphs for her. Argula was a “female devil,” a female desperado,” a “wretched and pathetic daughter of Eve,” an “arrogant devil,” a “fool” and he tops it off by calling her a “heretical bitch” and “shameless whore.” He could not believe that she would make the Virgin Mary equal to all women. Certainly not the most uplifting sermon!!
Despite the attack of the theologians Grumbach’s booklet became a bestseller and went through no less than sixteen editions and she became a household name. She was not done writing for the cause of reform either. She exhorted
“But how can I profit from such as you
Who force the people the truth to eschew?
You even dole out free advice
How we should offer obedient service
And hold our husbands in esteem
Anything else would make me squirm!
My heart and soul are both inclined
To be at his service at all times
Delighted always to obey I’d hate it any other way!
And I trust that to all it’s plain
He has uttered no word of complaint.
May God teach me to understand
How to conduct myself toward my man.
But should he ever wish to force me
From God’s word, compel or coerce me
I should think that counts for nought
(Which seems to be your anxious thought)
As I find in Matthew written
You can read it in Chapter Ten:”
Argula stated that her writing was no “woman’s chit-chat, but the word of God.” And it was not. Her writing is serious biblical interpretation ... She refused to be put down. Unheard of in that day, she traveled (alone) to
It is tragic that Argula’s name has been lost for most Christians. While she was not Luther, she was a great witness for Christ. She challenged powerful stereotypes that prevail even today in some places. When others ran, she stood in the gap. The biblical knowledge she gained as a child pain rich dividends in her writings and teaching. Even today her material is challenging and edifying and conducive to theological reflection.
So was Argula a “she devil” as the theologians called her? Or was she, as Hubmaier said, another Deborah, Huldah, Judith or one of Philip’s daughters. She was a remarkable woman … and I am happy to have this theologian on the Family Tree.
Shalom,
Bobby Valentine
0 comments:
Post a Comment